They’re not going to apologize. They’re owned by very wealthy people who benefit from the misinformation and horse races. Just like in the presidential election, they need to decisively lose, maybe for a few cycles, in order to change their ways.
Just keep doing what you’re doing, and being right, then more and more people will follow you and not them.
What were you saying in advance of 2016? I know Nate Silver always points to how he had Clinton in the 60-70 range at that was so much better than everyone else, curious if your model was up and running then.
They’re not going to apologize. They’re owned by very wealthy people who benefit from the misinformation and horse races. Just like in the presidential election, they need to decisively lose, maybe for a few cycles, in order to change their ways.
Just keep doing what you’re doing, and being right, then more and more people will follow you and not them.
Thank you
What were you saying in advance of 2016? I know Nate Silver always points to how he had Clinton in the 60-70 range at that was so much better than everyone else, curious if your model was up and running then.
The forecast was fine.
The way they blamed pollsters for "missing" is wrong, and the reasoning underlying it is even worse
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polls-missed-trump-we-asked-pollsters-why/